Maglev Blues

Interesting report by Xinhua, China’s national news agency, over the weekend. The story describes how the authorities have decided to suspend work on a $5 billion Maglev train that would have cut journey time between Shanghai and the lake resort city of Hangzhou to around half and hour. I currently takes more than two hours, so it would have been a huge improvement. What’s intriguing is the fact that the report specifically says the project was halted because of concerns expressed by local residents about the possible effects on their health from the powerful magnets used to keep the train floating above the rails. An anonymous pregnant lady who is one of those petitioning for the project to be suspended is even featured in the piece, which also states that “The local government has been under huge pressure over the past months, with crowds of petitioners knocking at their doors every day and thousands of complaints received online. The Minhang District government alone received more than 5,000 petitioners in a single day in March.”

The project was a huge white elephant anyway (as the story notes, a non-maglev high speed train would cost half as much and only add seven minutes to travel time). But it’s rare to see an official account like this that might be taken as encouraging public protest, which after all could encourage the “social instability” that Beijing fears so much. Perhaps the press is underlining the fact that it was protests by ordinary Chinese that brought about the change to stress the government’s responsiveness to public concern, even in big ticket projects like this one. Actually, the authorities in Chinese are displaying much greater flexibility and responsiveness. Take the 180 degree turnaround on the AIDs issue for example. I do have the nagging suspicion though that –given concerns about cost and safety, they were ready to dump this project anyway. I also wonder whether, if the government had decided to stick to its decision, all those petitions would have made the slightest bit of difference.

Related Topics: China
  • Latest on Global Spin

    Oded Balilty / Reuters

    Netanyahu’s New Government: Warming to Peace Talks with the Palestinians?

    A flurry of gestures toward the Palestinian leadership suggests that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, in his new role as leader of a center-right government, is warming toward the resumption of peace talks — or at least giving the appearance of warming; call it a rosy glow rising from a pair of announcements on Monday. One was about Palestinian prisoners who had been carrying out a mass hunger strike for weeks inside Israeli prisons. With several prisoners near death, Netanyahu approved an agreement that improves prison conditions and permits visits by family members in the Gaza Strip, the heavily guarded enclave that Palestinians have been allowed out of only for medical emergencies. Greeted by Palestinians as a victory, the deal eased concerns that a prisoner’s death might combust what are usually routine protests planned for Tuesday’s commemoration of Nakba Day, the “catastrophe” of Israel’s 1948 victory over Arab forces trying to prevent the establishment of a Jewish state.

    Bernat Armangue / AP

    Palestinians Mark Their Day of “Catastrophe”

    Protesters challenge Israeli troops in the West Bank while commemorating the Nakba, or “day of catastrophe” in Arabic, which marks the day when Israel declared its statehood in 1948—an act which forced thousands of Palestinians out of their homes and into a life of exile

    Christopher Furlong/ Getty Images

    Rebekah Brooks, Husband Charged in Phone-Hacking Scandal

    The convoluted saga of the British phone-hacking scandal seems to have been dragging on longer than a back-to-back performance of Wagner’s Ring Cycle. Yet despite the demise of Rupert Murdoch‘s News of the World, the launching of a public inquiry into British press standards, three police investigations and more than 40 arrests, the scandal has yet to draw real blood. The closest it has come was a report released this month by a Parliamentary committee, which accused Murdoch of turning a blind eye to the hacking at his paper and declared him “not a fit person” to run an international company — a damning conclusion that nonetheless seems to have had little immediate effect.

blog comments powered by Disqus