In Hong Kong, we like to blame pollution on the factories of neighboring Guangdong province, but the fact is that vehicle emissions are an even greater contributor to the appalling state of our air. After coal-burning power plants, they comprise the second largest form of air pollution, and the city reels daily, in emphysematous torment, because many of us imagine ownership of a Merc or Beemer to be some kind of fundamental human right.
There should be no problem, therefore, with passing a law that would prevent drivers from leaving their engines idling while waiting for partners, children, employers, drug dealers, hookers or whoever it is that keeps them there, at the kerb, emitting gratuitous carbon. After all, we’re not talking about imposing some draconian new fuel standard or punitive road tax. We’re just asking that drivers turn off their engines when their cars are stationary, as they are required to do in many places around the world.
Instead of committing to this mere formality of environmental protection, however, the government is moot. Chief Executive Donald Tsang said some months ago that prospective legislation “may” ban idling engines only “at particular hours” and “in particular zones,” which is as good as useless. Back in 2005, the legislature actually a passed a motion to ban idling engines but nothing happened, because the government decided the issue was “controversial,” as though reducing the amount of deadly pollutants in the air could in any way be tainted with controversy.
The Secretary for the Environment, Edward Yau, referred to the issue as controversial again yesterday—so much so that he is actually launching a two-month public consultation on the matter (“Would you like to keep choking on the same morbid haze? Tick yes or no”). But let us be clear. There is nothing to consult the public about. And the only controversy about a ban is that drivers won’t be able to run the air-conditioner or CD player while parked anymore.
They’ll get over it. It will take us somewhat longer to get over the government’s indecision about such a simple and same time urgent matter of public health.
Carmageddon
-
Latest on Global Spin
Netanyahu’s New Government: Warming to Peace Talks with the Palestinians?
A flurry of gestures toward the Palestinian leadership suggests that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, in his new role as leader of a center-right government, is warming toward the resumption of peace talks — or at least giving the appearance of warming; call it a rosy glow rising from a pair of announcements on Monday. One was about Palestinian prisoners who had been carrying out a mass hunger strike for weeks inside Israeli prisons. With several prisoners near death, Netanyahu approved an agreement that improves prison conditions and permits visits by family members in the Gaza Strip, the heavily guarded enclave that Palestinians have been allowed out of only for medical emergencies. Greeted by Palestinians as a victory, the deal eased concerns that a prisoner’s death might combust what are usually routine protests planned for Tuesday’s commemoration of Nakba Day, the “catastrophe” of Israel’s 1948 victory over Arab forces trying to prevent the establishment of a Jewish state.
Palestinians Mark Their Day of “Catastrophe”
Protesters challenge Israeli troops in the West Bank while commemorating the Nakba, or “day of catastrophe” in Arabic, which marks the day when Israel declared its statehood in 1948—an act which forced thousands of Palestinians out of their homes and into a life of exile
Rebekah Brooks, Husband Charged in Phone-Hacking Scandal
The convoluted saga of the British phone-hacking scandal seems to have been dragging on longer than a back-to-back performance of Wagner’s Ring Cycle. Yet despite the demise of Rupert Murdoch‘s News of the World, the launching of a public inquiry into British press standards, three police investigations and more than 40 arrests, the scandal has yet to draw real blood. The closest it has come was a report released this month by a Parliamentary committee, which accused Murdoch of turning a blind eye to the hacking at his paper and declared him “not a fit person” to run an international company — a damning conclusion that nonetheless seems to have had little immediate effect.
