Rights Group: Political Arrests Up In China

Trend spotting in China is often a perilous exercise. The country is so big that you can easily pick a few cases to make one argument, then find a few more to make the opposite point. That’s especially true when considering political reform, where so much of the action is out of the public eye. Some new numbers on political arrests in China are the closest thing to empirical evidence that some sort of crackdown has been underway in the past few years. According to the Dui Hua Foundation, a San Francisco-based human rights group, the number of arrests on the main political charge, “endangering state security,” doubled last year. The first few paragraphs of their release are quoted below. The entire report is here. It’s worth noting that these numbers themselves don’t provide a complete picture, but the jump is so significant that it’s worth pointing out.

Chinese arrests for “endangering state security” (ESS) doubled in 2006 over the previous year, according to official statistics recently released by the Chinese government.

The just-published 2007 China Law Yearbook reveals that in 2006 state prosecutors approved the arrest of 604 individuals detained by public security and state security police in ESS cases, up from 296 in 2005. This marks the highest number of ESS arrests in China since 2002.

The statistics also show the initiation of prosecutions in 258 ESS cases involving 561 individuals in 2006, compared to 185 cases involving 349 people in 2005.

“These are some of the only official numbers that the Chinese government publishes with respect to its handling of political crime,” notes John Kamm, executive director of The Dui Hua Foundation. “This dramatic increase in arrests confirms the heightened crackdown on dissent in China that we’ve been witnessing since at least the middle of 2005.”

Related Topics: China
  • Latest on Global Spin

    Oded Balilty / Reuters

    Netanyahu’s New Government: Warming to Peace Talks with the Palestinians?

    A flurry of gestures toward the Palestinian leadership suggests that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, in his new role as leader of a center-right government, is warming toward the resumption of peace talks — or at least giving the appearance of warming; call it a rosy glow rising from a pair of announcements on Monday. One was about Palestinian prisoners who had been carrying out a mass hunger strike for weeks inside Israeli prisons. With several prisoners near death, Netanyahu approved an agreement that improves prison conditions and permits visits by family members in the Gaza Strip, the heavily guarded enclave that Palestinians have been allowed out of only for medical emergencies. Greeted by Palestinians as a victory, the deal eased concerns that a prisoner’s death might combust what are usually routine protests planned for Tuesday’s commemoration of Nakba Day, the “catastrophe” of Israel’s 1948 victory over Arab forces trying to prevent the establishment of a Jewish state.

    Bernat Armangue / AP

    Palestinians Mark Their Day of “Catastrophe”

    Protesters challenge Israeli troops in the West Bank while commemorating the Nakba, or “day of catastrophe” in Arabic, which marks the day when Israel declared its statehood in 1948—an act which forced thousands of Palestinians out of their homes and into a life of exile

    Christopher Furlong/ Getty Images

    Rebekah Brooks, Husband Charged in Phone-Hacking Scandal

    The convoluted saga of the British phone-hacking scandal seems to have been dragging on longer than a back-to-back performance of Wagner’s Ring Cycle. Yet despite the demise of Rupert Murdoch‘s News of the World, the launching of a public inquiry into British press standards, three police investigations and more than 40 arrests, the scandal has yet to draw real blood. The closest it has come was a report released this month by a Parliamentary committee, which accused Murdoch of turning a blind eye to the hacking at his paper and declared him “not a fit person” to run an international company — a damning conclusion that nonetheless seems to have had little immediate effect.

blog comments powered by Disqus