In Charter 08, a Call for Democracy in China

The detention of two prominent intellectuals in Beijing this week, which Simon discusses below, was touched off by the release of “Charter 08,” a human rights manifesto signed by more than 300 Chinese scholars, activists, lawyers and retired officials. China scholar Perry Link has produced an English translation of the document, which is now up on the New York Review of Books website. Among the document’s 19 recommendations are calls for a new Chinese constitution, separation of political powers, direct elections, freedom to form political parties, free speech and reconciliation for those persecuted in previous political campaigns. In other words, it touches on just about every sensitive political topic in China.

Here’s a key passage:

The Chinese people, who have endured human rights disasters and uncountable struggles across these same years, now include many who see clearly that freedom, equality, and human rights are universal values of humankind and that democracy and constitutional government are the fundamental framework for protecting these values.

By departing from these values, the Chinese government’s approach to “modernization” has proven disastrous. It has stripped people of their rights, destroyed their dignity, and corrupted normal human intercourse. So we ask: Where is China headed in the twenty-first century? Will it continue with “modernization” under authoritarian rule, or will it embrace universal human values, join the mainstream of civilized nations, and build a democratic system? There can be no avoiding these questions.

Related Topics: China
  • Latest on Global Spin

    Pablo Martinez Monsivais / AP

    Obama’s Afghanistan Problem: Neither Karzai Nor the Taliban Like the ‘Reconciliation’ Script

    President Barack Obama huddled with President Hamid Karzai in Chicago on Sunday, urging Afghanistan’s leader to accelerate negotiations with the Taliban over a political solution to the longest war in America’s history. But the prospect for Karzai negotiating successfully with the insurgents is clouded by a question raised by Josef Stalin, on the eve of World War II, in response to the suggestion that he offer concessions to the Pope: “How many divisions does he have?” The Taliban now ask the same question about Karzai. And should the Afghan leader also ask himself the question, he might reach a similarly dispiriting conclusion. Karzai’s independent power base is minimal, as is his ability to influence the outcome of his country’s civil war absent direct U.S. involvement. And that gives neither Karzai nor the Taliban much incentive to cut a deal with the other.

    JOSEPH EID/AFP/GettyImages

    Must-Reads from Around the World, May 21, 2012

    Spillover - Lebanon’s Daily Star reports on escalating violence inside the country after soldiers shot dead a prominent anti-Bashar al-Assad Muslim preacher Sunday. “The gravity of the incident… prompted leaders on both sides of the political divide to call for calm and restraint to prevent the country from sliding into sectarian strife as a result of a spillover of the 15-month-old uprising in neighboring Syria,” it says.

    UPPA / ZUMAPRESS

    A Royal Party: Britain Celebrates 60 Years of Queen Elizabeth II

    From parades to concerts, and even tea with commoners, 86 year-old Queen Elizabeth II is traversing the United Kingdom to commemorate her Diamond Jubilee.

  • johnsmith9876

    “By departing from these values, the Chinese government’s approach to “modernization” has proven disastrous.”

    This statement is totally erroneous. First of all, the Chinese government has not departed these values. They have never really embrace these values. Every time there was any comment about how China implemented these values from outside, the Chinese government will predictably deny and object, and find excuses. There was never a case of gracefully accepting any comments.

    Secondly, not embracing these values, or departing from them, is certainly not “disastrous”, not to the Chinese government. No embracing these values is a very effective way to protect the government from dissent. Modernization, civilization, democracy must be viewed from a Chinese point of view, and with Chinese characteristics. The Chinese government’s action clearly indicated that human rights and universal human values have no place in Chinese democracy, civilization and modernization. A modern China is the new China under CCP rule. And China is the only country in the world that has any civilization with Chinese characteristics. And the way CCP runs the country is the only democratic system of government. That’s Chinese characteristics. China is democratic, modern and civilized, by definition.

  • eecavazos

    Mr. Ramzy,
    Will this Manifesto be counter-productive? Will it hinder the national government from fulfilling human rights reforms out of fear that while reeling in on the authority of the local governments it may also have the effect of limiting the national government’s authority? Is the reaction limited to the detention of prominent intellectuals or will manifestos such as this one cause more lasting reactions?

  • http://china.blogs.time.com/2008/12/10/overseas-chinese-in-support-of-charter-08/ The China Blog – TIME.com » Blog Archive Overseas Chinese in Support of “Charter 08″ «

    [...] including novelist Ha Jin and dissent physicist Fang Lizhi have signed a letter in support of “Charter 08,” the pro-democracy manifesto issued this week by several hundred mainland writers, lawyers and activists. Here’s a link to a [...]

  • justrecently

    One can argue that not every timing is perfect. But then, which timing would be perfect for a Charter 08?
    I think if there weren’t people pushing for democracy, it would never come. The KMT gave up its one-party rule because they knew that they would lose majority support if the clung to it by all means (and some deliberations about being more attractive internationally may have played a role, too). But no dictatorship hands political power because its beneficiaries simply decide it’s the right thing to do. It takes people who demand it.

  • chinesevipeditor

    The Washington Post today printed an Editorial on the subject of China’s Charter 08 in a very skin-deep way. I left a comment, talking about the Conspiracy Theory regarding the time and purpose of publication of Charter 08.
    The theory says it’s a scheme run by the China National Security Agency to boost Liu Xiaobo and Yu Jie’s leader status.

    It’s hard to prove it right or wrong. Time will tell us soon.

  • http://robertg69.wordpress.com/2009/01/09/north-american-readers-of-this-blog-probably-dont-know-much-about-charter-08/ North American readers of this blog probably don’t know much about Charter 08 « My agnostic views & images I like

    [...] In “Charter 08,” a Call for Democracy in China [...]

blog comments powered by Disqus