Why A Saudi Intervention into Bahrain Won’t End the Protests

Saudi troops in Bahrain? A month ago that was the worst case scenario, a threat put out there by the “sky is falling” extremists who were convinced that protesting in Bahrain would not go the way of peaceful demonstrations in Tunisia and Egypt. But the momentum of the movements sweeping the Middle East caught the imagination of young Bahrainis who seized the opportunity to push for their own democratic reforms. They scoffed at the idea that Saudi Arabia would send troops. But here they are, coming in 1000 strong, across a causeway better known for ferrying Saudi partygoers to a more liberal state where movies, booze and other carnal delights are freely available.

In theory the troops are there just to protect major government facilities such as electricity and water supplies. “Phew,” tweeted one observer, “And I thought they were here to shoot people.” But what the troops, sent in as part of the Gulf Cooperation Council Force, are really protecting is the GCC’s way of rule. In other words: autocratic and dictatorial regimes that have survived by grace of liberal cash handouts, not any kind of enlightened leadership (O.K. Qatar, you get a pass on that one – but that’s another blog post). If, god forbid, Bahrain’s protesters get what they want, which is by an large a constitutional monarchy, Saudi Arabia, Oman, the UAE and Kuwait may soon be forced to follow suit, or face the consequences. Already rulers in Oman and Saudi have been promising cash bonuses and loans as if that could somehow hold back the democratic tide. It won’t work. And for that matter, nor will sending Saudi troops into Bahrain. The protests have already moved beyond the point where fear is a negotiating tool.

If you have seen men demonstrating with bare torsos, it’s not because it’s hot in Bahrain. It’s a statement: They are baring their chests to meet the soldiers’ bullets. “Let the children die,” Hassan al Salman, a 23-year-old I.T. engineer with a nice car and a good job told me when I was in Bahrain last month. “Let the people die. I want to die, because if I die the people will get even more angry, and there will be bigger protests, and then we will get what we want.” If the protesters were armed, and demanding the implementation of Shariah law, or calling for the expulsion of the U.S.’s Fifth Fleet, which is stationed there, a crackdown may be considered justifiable. But what the protesters—who are, by the way, resolutely unarmed and peaceful— want is the ability to choose their representatives, freedom of speech, freedom of assembly and an end to the apartheid-like policies of a ruling Sunni minority over a Shia majority. The Saudi troops may succeed in quashing the demonstrations, but in the end, both the royal family that called them in and the GCC leadership that authorized the deployment will end up on the wrong side of history.

Subscribe to Aryn Baker on Facebook
Related Topics: arab uprisings, Conflict, Democracy, Dictatorships, Geo-political tensions, Human rights, Middle East
  • Latest on Global Spin

    Oded Balilty / Reuters

    Netanyahu’s New Government: Warming to Peace Talks with the Palestinians?

    A flurry of gestures toward the Palestinian leadership suggests that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, in his new role as leader of a center-right government, is warming toward the resumption of peace talks — or at least giving the appearance of warming; call it a rosy glow rising from a pair of announcements on Monday. One was about Palestinian prisoners who had been carrying out a mass hunger strike for weeks inside Israeli prisons. With several prisoners near death, Netanyahu approved an agreement that improves prison conditions and permits visits by family members in the Gaza Strip, the heavily guarded enclave that Palestinians have been allowed out of only for medical emergencies. Greeted by Palestinians as a victory, the deal eased concerns that a prisoner’s death might combust what are usually routine protests planned for Tuesday’s commemoration of Nakba Day, the “catastrophe” of Israel’s 1948 victory over Arab forces trying to prevent the establishment of a Jewish state.

    Bernat Armangue / AP

    Palestinians Mark Their Day of “Catastrophe”

    Protesters challenge Israeli troops in the West Bank while commemorating the Nakba, or “day of catastrophe” in Arabic, which marks the day when Israel declared its statehood in 1948—an act which forced thousands of Palestinians out of their homes and into a life of exile

    Christopher Furlong/ Getty Images

    Rebekah Brooks, Husband Charged in Phone-Hacking Scandal

    The convoluted saga of the British phone-hacking scandal seems to have been dragging on longer than a back-to-back performance of Wagner’s Ring Cycle. Yet despite the demise of Rupert Murdoch‘s News of the World, the launching of a public inquiry into British press standards, three police investigations and more than 40 arrests, the scandal has yet to draw real blood. The closest it has come was a report released this month by a Parliamentary committee, which accused Murdoch of turning a blind eye to the hacking at his paper and declared him “not a fit person” to run an international company — a damning conclusion that nonetheless seems to have had little immediate effect.

  • http://thophia.wordpress.com thophia

    This article is slightly biased, I have to say. Having lived many years in Bahrain, and my parents still working there, I find that your description of the royal family lacks substance. Yes its a monarchy, and yes, the people are angry, but autocratic and dictatorial regimes that have survived by grace of liberal cash handouts, not any kind of enlightened leadership? So maybe you visited Bahrain last month, but for a few days? a week max? you’ve only seen what the opposition want the ingternational world to show, and the media only shows the negative sides to the situation.

    Unarmed, yes; but peaceful? http://yfrog.com/h0q0sgij : not so sure
    http://yfrog.com/h0tuunoj

    Furthur more, the current events happening in Bahrain are more than civilians demanding their rights, it is a sectarian conflit. If Bahrain changed it’s way of ruling, and the island fell to a Sharia type regime, who do you think it would bother the most? I’m thinking the U.S seeing as the fifth fleet is based in Bahrain. If there ever was such a thing as “the Islamic republic of Bahrain”, which is by the way what the minority opposition groups are calling for, do you REALLY believe Bahrain will be better off? I think not.
    Bahrain is part of the GCC, should have every right to ask for help to avoid any more civilian violence. Because, as I am sure you are aware, the civilians are being quite violent. I see you did not mention that police officials were kidnapped? that teachers urged their students to strike and demonstrate with them in the capital? that the whole country is in standstill because the people are “unhappy”. Being a foreigner, I take no side, and see the arguments of both shia and sunni communities. But I don’t believe that violence is necessary. And I certainly disapprove how the media has distorted the facts. Apartheid-like rule? How can you possibly even compare the situation in Bahrain to that of a country under apartheid rule?
    With all due respect, I would review my facts before misguiding people, and more importantly, I would actually try to seperate what’s true from what is largely said but unsure. You know how Winston Churchill said that a lie gets halfway around the world before the truth has a chance to get its pants on? Well i’m believe there is more to the situation than your article suggests, and it is certainly more complex that you that what you present it to be.

  • http://harryredknapp.wordpress.com harryredknapp

    Hello

    Im an expat on this lovely island for the past 22 years. I needed to write this on the behalf of the people outside this country who will get a rather wrong picture due to articles like these by journalists who basically follow the steak trail, sit with the attention grabbers and its a wrap!

    Bahrain indeed needs to bolster its democratic reforms which have slowed down in the last 3-4 years – a process started 10 years back (how many monarchies do that?) It also needs to give more power to the parliament to make more substantial decisions which affect the citizens’ lives. Also the naturalization is indeed a scary aspect.

    This is however not a tin pot dictatorship. It is a monarchy which, since the 70s has ultra progressive and made amazing development in infrastructure, quality of living and other things. And it has done it with very little oil money because, simply put, it doesnt have any oil like it’s neighbours. Had it been a “typical” monarchy, this place, without disrespect, would have been another Yemen. In fact even the internet had not been censored up until a year back which was ironically initiated by MPs elected by the same people!

    Do you know, this country has no taxes? Education, health, government grants for higher studies, and subsidies for almost everything vital from gasoline, flour to even meat? And yet there are some absurd demands from the protestors? Where do you think all the pristine highways and infrastructure came from?

    Please do not use the word apartheid liberally. Sure, the people protesting are from a majority in terms of population. Do you know what minority of that majority is actually at the Lulu roundabout? Do you know that some of the biggest businesses on the island are owned by them? My sponsor is also one of “them”. This though will be a silent majority which will not speak up to avoid friction in their own community.

    The curent opposition is so divided amongst themselves that they cant control the Extreme elements who in turn have been using *some* of the youth to mobilize anarcy. 14th Feb was indeed a mistake which was acknowledged by the Crown Prince and he has been pressing for reforms and talks but some of the opposition are making the most elaborate demands.

    Remember, to all the outsiders – occupying a roundabout in a peaceful demonstration is something but when the extreme elements decide to enter the financial zones and set up illegal barricades, threatening local and foreign workers (like Ms Baker and me) headed to office, then it calls for Public Security intervention.

    Governments would do the same on Wall Street or the Canary Wharf.

    Finally, please note and see from the video how unarmed traffic police asked the young men to stop and open up the barricades which were illegal and last ditch attempt by the extreme Left to provoke some sort of reaction from the government. You can tell judge how peaceful these boys are.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2qgr6LBxvZg&feature=youtu.be

  • http://nidalk.wordpress.com nidalk

    @thopia & @harryredknapp

    A few points first,

    – Bahrain IS indeed very rich. The problem is that the wealth is concentrated in a few hands. Prince Al-Waleed bin Talal of Saudi, who is said to be the richest Arab, was once asked about his wealth by a Lebanese channel and he had said that it is the Bahrain PM who is the richest Arab and not him. Even if you don’t believe his words, it is true that the PM and his cronies posses incredible amount of wealth. Now don’t you find anything odd with a PM of such a tiny state with just over a million population being the richest in the region ? that too when thousands of Bahrainis are literally poor and unemployed despite being well educated in Arab standard. During my stay in Bahrain, I had the chance to be part of some charity work during the fasting month of Ramadan. At that time, we used to go to the poor houses of Bahrainis for supplying food for them. What I could see was in stark contrast with what I used to see in Riffa, where I used to say. Riffa and surrounding area is affluent with all the amenities mostly occupied by the rich and super rich.
    – The government has been systematically engaged in election gerrymandering and toppling the population by naturalizing people from outside the country. This is the same tactic adopted by Israeli government in occupied territories. While this is condemned in the case of Palestine, you think it is OK to practice in Bahrain ? In fact the government had employed some of the most notorious people from around the world to do all these.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ian_Henderson_(police_officer)

    – Virtually NO member from Shia community is allowed in Army where as these so called naturalized expatriates are admitted ad infinitum.

    – Government is not at all serious about talks are changing the situation. If they had any element of sincerity in their statements regarding peace and reform, the first thing should have been a thorough inquiry in to the shooting of 7 innocent protesters during Feb and taking actions against those who have perpetrated this heinous crime.

    – Above all, the protesters are not asking for something unusual or unacceptable to basic human standards. They are asking for democracy and freedom which are the very fundamental rights of any human being.

    When you see things at this backdrop, I think it is far more important and morally right to protest by blocking the access to financial hubs or other institutions.
    Now for a personal note, I am NOT a shia. I am an Indian who had the chance to experience the plight of poor Bahrainis.

  • http://kaljalahma.wordpress.com kaljalahma

    Reading your article, it seems to me that you have only spoken to people from the opposition and no one else, it is also obvious that you know nothing about Bahrain, its society or its politics, and you have surly not done your homework when it comes to the current situation in Bahrain either. What kills your credibility apart from a few other things is this:

    1. You say this “the protesters—who are, by the way, resolutely unarmed and peaceful” which I think we both know now after looking at the links attached by the previous posts, is not true. Let me also add that some of them were armed, and leave you with another link for you to see and judge how peaceful they seem to you.

    2. You say that the protestors “want the ability to choose their representatives, freedom of speech, freedom of assembly and an end to the apartheid-like policies of a ruling Sunni minority over a Shia majority”. If you had any intent on being fair you would have mentioned that we have freedom of speech, freedom of assembly and freedom of expression. The fact that you ignored the Crown Prince’s statement released on the 13th of march shows how one sided you are. And if you happen to defend yourself by saying that you didn’t see it, all the more reason to doubt your credibility. Anyway here is the link to the statement of our moderate, sensible, forward thinking, and sometimes mistake making, yes mistake making leadership. Even they have owned up to mistakes they have made.

    http://www.bna.bh/portal/en/news/449823

    3. You describe the monarchy indirectly as “autocratic and dictatorial regimes that have survived by grace of liberal cash handouts, not any kind of enlightened leadership” |I don’t know if you still believe that but if you do I hope that I can help you with that closed minded thought today.

    Excuse me for being a little aggressive, but it is articles like this that create hurdles for pioneering countries like Bahrain who want to continue to move forward and lead by example those countries who are less moderate, less democratic and less free.

    This is a link to a blogger I think you can learn a lot from, I hope you can put your pride aside to see how he takes every step possible to make sure he is as fair as can be to both sides involved in this dilemma, those are the characteristics of a true writer. Be more factual and less sentimental.

    http://www.bna.bh/portal/en/news/449823

    Reflections on The Bahrain Crisis And Recommendations for Moving Forward
    Posted on 13 March 2011 by Suhail
    I’ve been thinking about writing this blog post for several days now.
    It took a while for me to gather my thoughts, and for them to crystallise. But I’m ready to write now. Let me repeat what I said in my popular February blog post: I don’t claim to know the full truth, nor do I claim to be an expert. Like many people in this beautiful country, I have some views on the crisis we’re going through. Remember this is a blog and what I write here is my opinion. I’ve formed my opinion through the following methods:
    1) Using my own common sense
    2) Reading anti and pro-government newspapers
    3) Having lots of conversations with Shiite, Sunni and expat friends and acquaintances
    4) The social media (the least reliable source of information)
    I’m sharing openly and honestly, and would ask you to keep and open mind, and more importantly, an open heart. Okay, ready? Here goes:
    The Spectrum: Two extremes with a silent middle
    The most troubling thing that has emerged in this crisis are the extremists on both sides. On the protestors side there are those calling for the death of the Royal family and the government, and on the other are the ones who consider all the protestors traitors who deserve nothing less than death. And between those two extremes are the majority of the population that vary from leaning towards the protestors to leaning towards the government.

    I’ve attempted to portray the spectrum in a simple diagram. I hope it makes sense (I avoided the colour red in portraying either side). Let’s call the anti-government side the “Left”, and pro-government side the “Right.” The extreme Left’s view can be summarised as follows:
    - Mostly Shiite
    - Don’t want dialogue (“Too late for that! Too many people died!”)
    - “Death to the ruling family!”
    - Our way or no way!
    - Don’t mind using violence to get their way (as seen with terrible attack on the university of Bahrain)
    - Lie and cheat for their cause.
    Remember this is the extreme Left. A few notches away from the extreme are those who want reform with a new constitution, an elected government and a constitutional monarchy (and that is subject to interpretation). They might not condone violence but they might (or might not) mind provocation, intimidation or disruption of normal life for others. And it goes on until you reach the extreme Right. They can be described as follows:
    - Mostly Sunni
    - Yes to the ruling family.
    - “These protestors are trouble makers!”
    - “They are backed by Iran”
    - “No changes needed!”
    - Our way or no way!
    - Don’t mind using violence to get their way.
    - Lie and cheat for their cause.
    As mentioned, between the two extremes are a so-called silent majority (which is not as silent as when the crisis first began) who might sympathise with points from either side, but have a general leaning towards one or the other. Their views are summarised below:
    - Believe that some changes are necessary
    - Both sides have valid points (and are annoyed by certain behaviours in both camps)
    - Yes to dialogue, and QUICK!
    - Re-introduce stalled reforms
    - Reduce corruption
    - No to violent and intimidating demonstrations
    So to summarise my point, most of the Bahraini society is not either “anti” or “pro” government; they lie somewhere on the spectrum from Left to Right.
    My position (for those who care)
    My personal motto can be summarised in this sentence “Yes to the Royal family, no to corruption”. I consider my self a Royalist, and I suspect I always will. I suppose I sit somewhere on the orange side of my diagram, very close to the middle. Let me add that being a Royalist does not mean I condone all the actions of the government. It does not mean I’m a yes-man or some sort of puppet or robot. I have a brain, thank you very much.
    Why I’m a Royalist
    There are several reasons. First of all, the Arab Gulf region has been ruled by various tribal families for centuries (if not millennia), and uprooting that system and replacing it with some sort of democratic republic in my opinion won’t work. Rightly or wrongly, we are not ready for a fully fledged democracy. We don’t have the maturity for it nor do we have the education levels required for it.
    Second, I think by and large they’re doing an okay job. You have to remember that all things are relative. One should not compare the Bahraini or GCC ruling families to Western governments, but rather to other third world countries, and to other Arab countries. Yes, they have corrupt elements, but don’t all governments have them, including Western ones? Personally, in the last few of years I’ve come to the conviction that the US government is one of the most corrupt in the world – but that’s a topic for another day.
    Through my late father, I dare say I had a unique insight into how ruling families operate and think. I was lucky enough to meet four Arab heads of state before I was 19 years old! I don’t say this to brag, but to make a point. They’re not ruthless dictators hell-bent on exploiting their people. Rather they’re (mostly) good people doing the best they can. In a very short period of time they had a massive influx of oil money come in, and they tried to help their countries as best they could. They introduced modernisation initiatives and massively upgraded their countries’ infrastructures. And they tried to “share the wealth” as best they could.
    They also saw it as their right to enrich themselves with the oil money. For me, it’s not a question of whether they can enrich themselves (there aren’t many poor Royal families around in the world). Rather, it’s a question of when is enough? A ruling family should never enrich itself at the expense of it’s people. I’d say the GCC Royal families have mixed results in this regard.
    Moving on, the third reason I’m a Royalist is because the alternative is damn scary. Better a family who ruled for hundreds of years and we know well, then someone else who’s agenda we don’t know. The most likely alternative is an Islamic government, which is not appealing at all. Let me repeat what I said in last month’s blog post, “The main problem with having the religious and political leadership combined is that the leadership starts talking in the name of God, and justifies their actions in the name of God. People can so easily be arrested and murdered when it’s done in God’s name.”
    The last reason I’m a Royalist is personal. I myself, and my family in general have seen nothing but kindness and generosity from the ruling family in Bahrain. Though I cannot claim to be close to anyone senior in the family myself, my father, grandfather, uncles and great uncles had excellent relations with the late Emirs Shaikh Essa bin Salman Al-Khalifa and Shaikh Salman bin Hamad Al-Khalifa, and with His Majesty King Hamad.
    I’d like to relay a few personal stories if I may. In the early 1990′s my late father was to be moved from being Saudi Ambassador to Bahrain to being the Saudi Ambassador to London. I had decided to stay in Bahrain to continue my studies here. I was in the University of Bahrain at the time and did not want to leave all my friends behind.
    Shaikh Essa very generously gave my father a farewell dinner, when he heard that I was staying in Bahrain he turned to me and said “Suhail you are like my son. Consider yourself like Hamad. If there is anything you need just let me know.” I thought that was incredibly sweet of him. Who else would go through the trouble being this kind and generous to an ambassador’s son?
    Another story. During the Azza [funeral reception] of my father last August, His Majesty King Hamad came to give his condolences. He generously made time to sit with just my mother, myself and my siblings. He said some very nice things about my late father, and it almost seemed like he had tears on the corners of his eyes. He told me and my siblings that we should consider ourselves like his children, and that we should not hesitate to ask him if we need anything.
    I consider myself to be very privileged to be the son of a great man (bear with me on this, I’m getting to a point). One of the many benefits of being my father’s son was the many things I learnt from him, and another one was being able to accompany him occasionally on visits he made to His Majesty King Hamad. Having seen the King talk privately among his friends and acquaintances, I can unequivocally say that he loves all his people. On the few times I’ve tagged along I’ve heard him speak on many topics, including his people. And the King never used any derogatory or demeaning language to describe any of them (unlike we see happening with some members of the Extreme Left – and Right for that matter). Though I don’t recall the details of the conversation, I do remember someone once bringing up the topic of Sunnis and Shiites in Bahrain, and the language he used was always along the lines that he considers all the people his children and that they should all be treated equally. I got the distinct message that he detested the notion of discrimination against any citizen.
    [Note to any weirdos who might think I'm showing off by talking about these things, please note this blog is not for you. Please scurry along and go somewhere else. I have nothing to show off about and nothing to prove.]
    Okay, back to ruling families in general. You have to remember that they consist of fallible people who can make mistakes, and sometimes they make big ones. And they sometimes get bad advice. I now want to move on to some more specifics about Bahrain.
    The truly amazing things the king did
    To give credit where credit is due, since His Majesty King Hamad came to the throne some amazing reforms have been introduced. Here are some of the highlights:
    • Introduced more freedom of speech and allowed opposition views to be heard (Heck! He allowed an opposition!)
    • Curbed corruption and improved corruption-detection methods
    • Allowed political exiles to return to Bahrain and even placed some of them in the government
    • Improved government transparency
    • Introduced an amnesty for all sides that were involved in past political conflicts
    • Introduced a constitution and (limited) democracy
    Now, show me another third world head of state that did this much and such a short period of time? True, His Majesty’s government is not perfect, but I think we have to be fair to it.
    So what went wrong?
    Why are we in the mess that we are in today? I think His Majesty’s government made a few mistakes. Here are the main ones that I can think of:
    1) Reforms stalled:
    The rate of reforms slowed over time, and they seem to have stopped altogether. The nation was on such a high in 2002 and 2003. There was jubilation and so much hope for the future. But as time went on everything just seemed to stop. The reforms just deflated.
    2) The opposition was not taken seriously:
    I suppose the government’s view of the opposition was something along the lines of “you should be thankful for what you have, don’t be so demanding!” The opposition’s view seemed to be “yeah but what you gave us is not enough! We want more!” They seemed to view the opposition as annoying ingrates, and did not take their concerns and demands too seriously (some of which turned out to be quite legitimate). I’ll leave it up to you to decide who was right – or who was more right.
    3) Inconsistent behaviour:
    I think this is the big one. There was clear and open communication in some areas, but vagueness and ambiguity in others. Corruption was halted in some areas, but tolerated in others. There did not seem to be a consistent policy regarding many issues. Internet was open and free, then it was censored. Some opposition websites were allowed, while others were blocked. Some vocal opposition members were allowed to speak and go about their business, while others were arrested (and allegedly tortured). Some topics were discussed openly in the papers, but would later become taboo. It was quite confusing, not to mention frustrating.
    4) Political naturalisation:
    I can’t think of a single person who likes this policy. It did so much damage and brought the country back a million years. I hope this policy will be stopped and reversed.
    Right, moving on…
    Mistakes made during the events of February 14th
    I think both sides made some serious mistakes during the “uprising” of 14th of February. I don’t want to repeat my self , but let me start with the oppositions mistakes:
    1) Peaceful but angry but vengeful but provocative but violent:
    As I said last time, there were people with various intentions (ranging from peaceful to hell-bent on violence). Lets be honest here, the demonstrations were not all “peaceful”. A true peaceful demonstration in the spirit of Gandhi and Martin Luther King means peaceful in all aspects. Provoking the security forces and calling them names but not attacking first is not peaceful. Also, disrupting the lives of ordinary Bahraini citizens by blocking roads, slowing traffic and intimidating families is not peaceful.
    2) Bad timing:
    I think choosing the anniversary of the Charter was not right. Why try to embarrass the King like that? I don’t think this helped their cause one bit. Also, calling it “the day of rage” did not help. Besides, how can a day of rage be peaceful?
    3) Speaking on behalf of “the people”:
    The Arabic word for the people is Al-Sha’b (الشعب). In Egypt the protestors held up placards saying “Al-Sha’b want to overthrow the government.” And the opposition here copied them. The only problem was that they did not represent all the people, only a portion of a portion of the society. Personally, it upsets me that someone shouting violent anti-government slogans is claiming to speak on my behalf.
    4) Not understanding how threatened regimes react:
    I’ll repeat what I said before, the way the Pearl Roundabout was cleared on “Bloody Thursday” the 17th of February was completely unjustified and unnecessarily brutal. However, the gathering there was illegal. And you’ve got to remember when a regime is threatened it WILL react and defend itself. How do you think the US government would react if waves of people started marching towards the white house “shouting death to Obama!”? I suspect they’d react with riot police and tear gas. In fact during the same week as the unrests were taking place here, I saw a news report on a European news channel showing rioters in the German city of Dresden being confronted by riot police and tear gas.
    5) Being disorganised and unleashing chaos:
    One thing that is clear is that the protestors/rioters did not have the same agenda. And we can see this now where we have some protestors running amuck, and the opposition leaders not being able to rein them in. This was exemplified by the ugliness that was seen at the University of Bahrain. There are no words to describe this horrible scene.
    So where do we go from here?
    As one European relative mentioned to me recently “democracy means making compromises.” I think both sides need to make concessions, how else are we to move forward? Personally, I think the opposition has some very valid demands, and they obviously feel very strongly about them, or else we would not have this crisis that we have today. So for what it’s worth, here are my thoughts on how this country can move forward. First, my recommendations for the government.
    Recommendations for the government

    1) Introduce a South African-style Truth and Reconciliation Commission:
    If the South Africans managed to get over their decades of racial tensions caused by Apartheid, then surely we can too? Should be a lot easier for us too. I suggest we bring in some South African experts and conduct an honest and open Truth and Reconciliation process where everyone can talk openly and honestly about their grievances. I think the very fact that people will be allowed to speak openly will help them to heal. The proceedings should be aired live without edits on a dedicated Bahrain TV channel for all the world to see. After the proceedings are over the government should take the appropriate actions so that the country will never suffer through another crisis like this again.
    2) Curb corruption and get rid of corrupt government officials:
    Like I said, we made huge strides in the last decade, but more could be done. All government officials should be clean as a whistle. This, over time, will hopefully bring back trust in the government.
    2) Treat all government job applicants equally:
    I’m referring here to jobs in the Ministry of Interior and The Ministry of Defence. If as a Bahraini society we really have no difference between Shiites and Sunnis, why do Shiites only have limited opportunities in these ministries? I’m happy to hear that the government has opened 20,000 jobs in the Ministry of Interior. A good first step but there are many others to go.
    3) Investigate the housing issue:
    This seems to be a very sensitive topic with the opposition. I personally cannot claim to know anything about it, but it seems many citizens are unhappy with the rate of government housing developments, and the distribution of the housing.
    4) Investigate claims of citizens “not living in dignity”:
    Again, I don’t know enough about this topic, but obviously the protestors feel that they are treated in an undignified manner. The very fact that they feel so strongly about it must mean there is some truth to it. This should be fully investigated and corrective steps should be taken to remedy the situation.
    5) Improve the education system:
    In my opinion, the most important part of a country is it’s education system. If that’s flawed, then the country is flawed. We need better education and quick! Otherwise we continue to graduate young people who either have a sense of entitlement, or a sense of hopelessness. Surely we can do better than that! I also recommend that religious classes of both sects are taught. When I was in government school, only the Sunni version of Islam was taught. That can’t be healthy (I presume this is still the case but I don’t know for sure). To promote harmony, Shiites and Sunnis have to understand each other better, and where better to start than in school?
    6) Stop political naturalisation:
    Like I said, I don’t think anyone really liked this. The sooner it is stopped the better.
    My Recommendations for the opposition
    1) Embrace the olive branch that was offered:
    What confuses me (and scares me a bit) is that the opposition is acting stubborn and harsh while they’re not in power. How would they behave if they were in power?? Why create obstacles and demands when the government is finally willing to listen? Okay, some of our brothers and sisters have died (which bothers everyone) but does that justify acting unreasonably? The opposition has scored a major victory by getting the government’s attention. Even the King said on the radio “lessons were learnt.” I’m not a religious scholar, but as I understand it the Holy Quran commands us to “lean towards peace” if the opposing party has opted for peace [Surrat Al-Anfal]. Also, the prophet Mohammed (PBUH) forgave his aggressors after the “Fath Makka” victory. He said to the people who tormented and tortured him, and killed his followers and family members “Go for you are free.” Let’s use our Blessed Prophet as our role model.
    2) Stop using the word “Al-Sha’b”:
    You don’t speak on behalf of the Bahraini people. Yes you have serious grievances that need to be addressed, but do you have the right to cripple the country, and frighten other Bahraini citizens and their families?
    3) Stop the drama:
    Why wear “kafan” [the burial cloth for the deceased] to protests? I repeat, the opposition has made a very powerful point and has scored a massive victory by getting the King’s attention. They have also garnered massive national and international sympathy from the events of “Bloody Thursday”, why ruin it? They lose sympathy every day the protests are escalated.
    Right, I’m not done yet dishing out advice…
    My advice to everybody else:
    1) Control your emotions:
    Look, these are tense and difficult times, but things are only made worse by negative comments in the social media or in public. Remember that everybody is tense, so you have to work extra hard on controlling your emotions. Breathe and try to stay calm.
    2) Respect other’s opinions:
    This is a national crisis, and we have to be open and understanding to each other’s grievances. Many people seem to have the attitude of “you’re either with me or against me!” It’s not so simple, the world is not black or white; it has many shades of grey in between. The Bahraini spectrum and views are wide, so let’s try to keep an open mind and heart.
    3) Avoid sarcasm and racial slurs:
    I get a lot of tweets and FB comments from people making sarcastic and demeaning comments about the opposing camps. I usually ignore these. I don’t believe that this helps. I think we should all avoid fanning the flames. We are all equal in God’s eyes and let’s be better than those who want to spread hatred.
    4) Stop negative messages dead in their tracks:
    If you receive a negative tweet/SMS/BBM or whatever, don’t forward it. Do your part in stopping the hatefulness.
    5) Work on improving yourself:
    This is a powerful spiritual principle, the more people introspect and work on improving themselves, the better the world will become. Personally, I’ve been spending a lot of time and energy on staying calm, positive and optimistic. I breathe and try to stay calm whenever I feel my temper rising due to something that has happened.
    6) Pray:
    The amount of Du’aa [prayer asking for something, not part of the 5 daily prayers] I do these days has probably gone up ten fold. I pray for wisdom and for wise men to prevail. I pray for His Majesty and I pray for the Crown Prince, who surely feels like he is carrying the weight of the world on his shoulders, and I pray for all those who want genuine changes and improvements for the country and do not condone violence.
    Will Bahrain get out of this Crisis?
    I think so. If we allow it to, this could be one of the best things that ever happened to this country. God willing the young men who passed away will not have died in vain. They gave their blood so that this country can become better, and God willing it will become better.
    I have faith that wisdom and wise men (on all sides) will prevail. And I pray and pray and pray…

  • http://kaljalahma.wordpress.com kaljalahma

    I apologize, this is the bloggers website:

    http://www.suhailalgosaibi.com/

  • http://nidalk.wordpress.com nidalk

    @kaljalahma

    >>Why I’m a Royalist
    >>There are several reasons. First of all, the Arab Gulf >>region has been ruled by various tribal families for >>centuries (if not millennia), and uprooting that system
    >> and replacing it with some sort of democratic
    >>republic in my opinion won’t work. Rightly or wrongly,
    >>we are not ready for a fully fledged democracy. We
    >>don’t have the maturity for it nor do we have the
    >>education levels required for it.

    How do you assume that you don’t have the maturity? most of the people in Bahrain think otherwise as it was clear from the sheer number of people who had participated in the biggest demonstration earlier. Also, there are many countries in the world, which had monarchy or colonialism for centuries and then went for democracy successfully. In India, we had a mixture of colonialism, tribalism and monarchy for centuries and went for democracy successfully. Things are much better in India now(ofcourse we do have problems as anyone else! )

    Also, you are totally wrong in assuming that democracy is alien to Arab region. If you trace back to the earliest form of democracy, accountability, transparency and written constitution you will be taken to the time of Prophet Muhammed(PBUH) and his followers.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constitution_of_Medina

    >>Yes, they have corrupt elements, but don’t all >>governments have them, including Western ones? >>Personally, in the last few of years I’ve come to the >>conviction that the US government is one of the most >>corrupt in the world – but that’s a topic for another day

    All governments have corruption. But in democracy, every single person in the country is accountable. So it tends to be much lesser. In monarchy or dictatorships the king or dictators are NOT accountable for anything and hence it is worse! Haven’t you noticed that all the dictators and kings (Bahrain PM, Saudi King, Mubarak, Gaddafi etc) are included in the richest people in the world while most of the heads of the democratic countries in the world are not included ? How does it happen ?
    Just for an e.g Previous Indian Telecom minister and many of his cronies are behind bars now as they are charged in a corruption scandal. You think such a thing can happen in Bahrain ? where rulers are put behind bars for corruption ? The fear of being caught and the confidence of not being accountable makes a HUGE difference.

    Also, please read my previous reply to others.

  • marknicosia

    @kaljalahma

    1. Interesting that you should be cutting and pasting from a Bahrain Ministry of Information website.

    2. When I lived in Bahrain for 10 years, the Al Gosaibi family were from the E. Province of Saudi Arabia. Maybe they are “new nationals” now.

    3. For which government hired p.r. agency do you work?

    M.

  • http://truthfulexpat.wordpress.com truthfulexpat

    Where do you get the idea that these protestors are peaceful and unarmed? They might chant “peaceful, peaceful” to the cameras, but behind the scenes they are attacking poor labourers, threatening small businesses from opening, stopping ordinary people from getting to work and chanting death threats to the monarchy! They are loose on the streets and we are having to hide at home for fear of them! We welcome the GCC troops (part of the Peninsula treaty) into Bahrain to protect the safety and security of ordinary citizens. These people have abused the freedom they have been given to take the country by ransom – what other country would allow this situation to continue? They have rejected peaceful dialogue and they do not represent the majority of Bahrain – they have leaders with other agendas. Please open your eyes – Bahrain is not perfect but no-one is being suppressed. Most of these protestors have nice cars and homes and sadly not all of them want to work. Let them see how that would work in a country with democracy….

  • http://barenjin.wordpress.com barenjin

    The situation in Bahrain is veeeery complex blablabla The Al Khalifa Royal family aren’t sooo bad blablabla There’s a huuuge secterian divide between Sunni and Shia in Bahrain blablabla Peaceful protestors are not sooo peaceful blablabla Arabs are not ready for democracy blablabla Shia are liers and they deserve to be killed on the streets blablabla

    Seriously do you think it works? I am getting bored of this shit. Do the Royal families believe that they can stay FOREVER… it’s about time they think of a less disgraceful exist, really! People WANT change and they are paying with their lives to get it. The Bahraini people deserve it and we’ll get it – peace, democracy and unity. The history will not forgive those who put hands with our oppressors.

  • http://unitebh.wordpress.com unitebh

    What is this lady talking about. Does not try to find out the truth and blurts out what she thinks, as if its an official report?

    You want an idea of what is happening here?

    They block the road. Keep people from getting to work. They provocate passers by and the police. They call bad words. They do everything except throw the first punch.

    Frustrated… someone reacts and they take a photo of that and put in on the net claiming they are peaceful and others started it.

    And people like you are stupid enough not to understand all this and blame the government who has been very very lenient with them considering the stuff they are doing.

    A beautiful country is going to the dogs… People behind this are not trying to make Bahrain or its people better. They are a group of rich people, who want power, just manipulating the backward class promising them riches they will never get.

    These manipulators don’t even come in the front of the attack. They stay safe in their tents while the high spirited, misled youth go hurt themselves.

  • http://unitebh.wordpress.com unitebh

    Dear Nidalk,

    You view point about democracy is true but not valid for Bahrain. I live in Bahrain. I know. The ruling family has been doing tons to bring up the backward class.

    Even in democracy the bad guys survive. It becomes useful when you have dictators that do not care about its people. Not when the Ruling family does try to help. Free education, free health facility, unemployeement benefits, Tamkeen… the list goes on.

    This fight is not about freedom. Its the mis understanding that if it becomes a democracy then all the oil money will go to their pockets. Its the lack of education/understanding about economics or how the world works.

  • http://nidalk.wordpress.com nidalk

    Dear UniteBH,

    Saying “….not valid for Bahrain” does not cut. You need to substantiate your points. Why is it not applicable to Bahrain ? What is there with Bahrain society which makes it incompatible with Democracy ? Also you have not answered to my specific points like
    1) Economic disparity and huge amount of wealth amassed by ruling family especially PM while tens of thousands are struggling. I have had so many Bahraini friends who were well educated and willing to work but were unable to find good jobs.
    2) Trying to topple the balance of population by naturalization process
    3) Outright rejection of Shia community members in military and related services
    4) Shooting and killing of innocent and peaceful protesters during the very beginning of protest.
    5) Recruiting one of the most notorious person in the police to oppress people’s genuine demand for freedom and democracy

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ian_Henderson_(police_officer)

    I can go and on… If you are willing to answer to my points, I am ready to reply again and have a healthy debate on this issue.

    Thanks and Regards,
    Nidal

  • http://dovyhawk.wordpress.com dovyhawk

    Regardless of how good the monarchs maybe on personal level, kingship in muslim history was introduced by the Ummayids and not by caliphs following Prophet Mohammad thus monarchy’s position is not really legitimate in a Muslim state.

    Secondly, 70% cannot be ruled over by 30% under any kind of democracy.

    Thus its quite obvious which way the history would go ultimately.

  • http://unitebh.wordpress.com unitebh

    Dear Nidalk,

    Just saw ur mail. Firstly, I did not see your first post. I was responding to the aspect about democracy.

    But since you brought it up let me try to answer what i can.

    1. Kingdom, Dictatorship or Democracy, every country has a division between the haves and the have-nots. It is the curse of how economics work and Bahrain is no exception. I believe you already know about wealth accumulated by most the polititions in India. Nothing will give equal distribution of wealth in any case.

    2. & 3. As wonderful as a country Bahrain is, the gap between the haves and have-nots immediately led to the shia opposition to complain that their plight is because of the sunnis. This is because of the native negative feelings at the core which will not change that easily. In such a situation it is purely a matter of survival, not to give them access to guns they can use against you. Maintaining a trust worthy military is very important for any leadership. And to maintain that safety bubble naturalization becomes necessary.

    But if you observe in the last ten to thirteen years, the government has opened up the doors to other government jobs in the country without differentiation of sects. Only military and police are out of bound for reasons mentioned above.

    4. That was a sad situation which went out of hand. Nothing can compensate for the lives but the government went head over heals trying to compromise, to make up for that mistake. Its is the same as these same demonstrators burning to death an Indian Civilian in jidhaffs during the previous uprising 15 years ago. My family knew this guy and he was just a staff of the video shop they burned. They locked him in it and set it on fire. Can they ever make up for that?

    5. I didn’t know about Henderson till now but that is irrelevant to todays context as both sides have done very bad things during that period of uprising [including the acts mentioned above]. H.H.King Hamad was not in charge then and he did bring a lot of reforms after that to improve on the situation.

    As a foot note… I am not a sunni :)

  • http://nidalk.wordpress.com nidalk

    Dear Unitebh,

    >>1. Kingdom, Dictatorship or Democracy, every
    >> country has a division between the haves and the
    >> have-nots. It is the curse of how economics work
    >> and Bahrain is no exception. I believe you already
    >> know about wealth accumulated by most the
    >> polititions in India

    No, the cases in India and Bahrain are different. As I mentioned in my previous post, every single person in India are accountable that include the PM and all the ministers. This is why former Telecom minister is in Jail now. There are so many such cases. Is there a SINGLE such case in Bahrain where the member of Royal family was put for trial atleast ? There are SO MANY Indian ministers who are POOR. It is well know in India. Now, how can you compare this with a dictatorship where there is ABSOLUTELY NO ACCOUNTABILITY, No trial for the corruption, no meaningful power for the people to choose and punish the leaders by means of meaningful election ? I am not a socialist or I don’t stand for equality among everyone on economical terms. But, it should be “prosperity for all and luxury for some” and NOT “luxury for some and poverty for the rest”. Let me repeat from my earlier post, it is not coincidence that most of the dictators and kings find their place in the richest list. But most of the politicians do NOT make it.

    Your reply for 2&3 is strikingly similar to what Israel uses to justify their illegal occupation in the Palestine land. And the tactic they adopted has been similar to what is adopted by Bahrain government and Ian Henderson has been the chief architect of this. That IS the significance of Ian Henderson in this whole game. If you google for him, you will find all the notorious track records of him. In fact there was big uproar in British parliament for his alleged role in Bahrain by leading MPs

    >> That was a sad situation which went out of hand.
    >> Nothing can compensate for the lives but the
    >> government went head over heals trying to
    >> compromise, to make up for that mistake

    And have the people responsible for this been punished yet ? or any action taken against them yet ? that shows the credibility of the government

    >> Its is the same as these same demonstrators
    >> burning to death an Indian Civilian in jidhaffs during
    >> the previous uprising 15 years ago. My family knew
    >> this guy and he was just a staff of the video shop
    >> they burned. They locked him in it and set it on fire.
    >> Can they ever make up for that?

    While I absolutely despise any form of violence including the above mentioned in the above case, let me tell you these are different. The one from government is systematic and institutional. The other one is due to the infiltration of criminal elements in to the movement. This is very similar to Palestine issue. Just because of some bad elements doing something evil against innocent Israeli citizens, will you justify illegal occupation and systematic and institutional discrimination and torture of Palestines ? I am surprised that you can’t see the difference here.

    >> H.H.King Hamad was not in charge then and he did
    >> bring a lot of reforms after that to improve on the
    >> situation.

    The changes have been cosmetic and nothing significant or radical. Everyone in Bahrain knows where is the epicenter of corruption in Bahrain. Has he taken any action against that person ? NEVER!

    Historically, dictatorships in various forms have been the biggest single cause of pain for people. Bahrain is not different.

    Thanks again and Regards,
    Nidal

blog comments powered by Disqus