A Marriage of Interests: Why Bahrain’s King Should Give Britain’s Royal Wedding a Miss

Westminster Abbey is a “Royal Peculiar.” The term applies to churches that fall under the direct jurisdiction of the British monarch rather than a bishop, but seemed especially apt during a Commonwealth Day celebration held there on March 15. The service blended the pomp and tradition associated with Britain’s state occasions with vivid song and dance performances and some tub-thumping about women’s equality. That Queen Elizabeth II, an icon of consistency, should deliver the keynote address on the Commonwealth’s 2011 theme of Women as Agents of Change, added to the surreality of the occasion. “Let us all give a thought to the practical ways in which we, as individuals or as groups, can provide support to girls and women—so that everyone can have a chance of a fuller and more rewarding life, wherever they happen to be born,” said the Queen in the pre-recorded speech, as Her non-digitized Majesty, resplendent in salmon pink, sat impassively in her pew.

On April 29, in the same church, one woman is set to take her chance of a fuller and more rewarding life as a royal, despite having been born a commoner. Catherine Middleton—you may know her as “Kate” but the process of elevation from hoi polloi to crème de la crème has already started with the re-appropriation of our her classier full name—will marry the Queen’s grandson William in front of family, friends, and an assortment of British politicians, celebrities, charity workers, heads of state and foreign royals. (One trusts in the spirit of grandmother-in-law-to-be’s Commonwealth message, Catherine will omit any promise to “obey” her husband from the vows.) Despite a lengthy guest list—reported to number as many as 1,900, though no details have been released by the couple—the service could feel quite intimate. As I realized during Commonwealth Day from my privileged perch in the South Transept of the Abbey, in a section known as Poets’ Corner after the famous literary figures buried or commemorated there, the architecture of the building will block the nuptials from direct view of most of the congregation, who will watch the ceremony on screens. Only the best seats in the carved wooden Choir and under the Lantern, where Kings and Queens have been crowned since 1066 (and recreated for a key scene in The King’s Speech), will enjoy unimpeded sight of the first Windsor wedding on the premises since Prince Andrew made an honest woman of Sarah Ferguson.

Sarah Ferguson will not be among those lucky enough to snag these seats. The Duchess of York revealed she has not received an invitation. Much of the inner sanctum will be reserved for people close to the couple, but places in the Choir will also be allocated to foreign royals, an Abbey official told me. Although unconfirmed, it seems likely that invitations have been received in at least a few royal households where attention may be trained on events of a little more immediacy and at least as much excitement as an April wedding. These might include King Mohammed V of Morocco, who it was announced yesterday will welcome the bridegroom’s dad, the Prince of Wales, and stepmother, Camilla, the Duchess of Cornwall, during their official visit in April, planned to focus on British commerce and going ahead despite turbulence in the country.

Bahrain’s King Hamad ibn Isa Al Khalifa is also reported to have received an embossed “stiffy” in the post. He may feel tempted by the idea of enjoying respite in a country where republican protests remain polite* and support for the monarch is undimmed. But after the bloody repression of Bahraini pro-democracy protestors and his decision to request help from Saudi troops to shore up his regime, Al Khalifa’s presence would be as uncomfortable at the wedding as the Ancient Mariner’s and leaving his kingdom as might prove as foolhardy as shooting an albatross.

*UPDATE: Graham Smith, who leads the U.K.’s anti-monarchist pressure group Republic, has sent a letter to Catherine and William asking them to withdraw the invitation to “the King of Bahrain and any other Middle Eastern despot.” “While I oppose your right to inherit public office in this country and will do all I can to ensure the Queen’s successor is elected,” he writes, “I wish you both well in married life and trust you will make the right decision on this occasion.” The full text of the letter is here.

Subscribe to Catherine Mayer on Facebook
Related Topics: Al Khalifa, bahrain, Catherine Middleton, Celebrities, Commonwealth, Duchess of Cornwall, King Mohammed V, Morocco, Prince of Wales, Prince William, Queen Elizabeth II, Royal Wedding, Saudi Troops, The King's Speech, Westminster Abbey, Women's Rights, arab uprisings, Democracy, Dictatorships, Middle East, U.K., Uncategorized
  • Latest on Global Spin

    Oded Balilty / Reuters

    Netanyahu’s New Government: Warming to Peace Talks with the Palestinians?

    A flurry of gestures toward the Palestinian leadership suggests that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, in his new role as leader of a center-right government, is warming toward the resumption of peace talks — or at least giving the appearance of warming; call it a rosy glow rising from a pair of announcements on Monday. One was about Palestinian prisoners who had been carrying out a mass hunger strike for weeks inside Israeli prisons. With several prisoners near death, Netanyahu approved an agreement that improves prison conditions and permits visits by family members in the Gaza Strip, the heavily guarded enclave that Palestinians have been allowed out of only for medical emergencies. Greeted by Palestinians as a victory, the deal eased concerns that a prisoner’s death might combust what are usually routine protests planned for Tuesday’s commemoration of Nakba Day, the “catastrophe” of Israel’s 1948 victory over Arab forces trying to prevent the establishment of a Jewish state.

    Bernat Armangue / AP

    Palestinians Mark Their Day of “Catastrophe”

    Protesters challenge Israeli troops in the West Bank while commemorating the Nakba, or “day of catastrophe” in Arabic, which marks the day when Israel declared its statehood in 1948—an act which forced thousands of Palestinians out of their homes and into a life of exile

    Christopher Furlong/ Getty Images

    Rebekah Brooks, Husband Charged in Phone-Hacking Scandal

    The convoluted saga of the British phone-hacking scandal seems to have been dragging on longer than a back-to-back performance of Wagner’s Ring Cycle. Yet despite the demise of Rupert Murdoch‘s News of the World, the launching of a public inquiry into British press standards, three police investigations and more than 40 arrests, the scandal has yet to draw real blood. The closest it has come was a report released this month by a Parliamentary committee, which accused Murdoch of turning a blind eye to the hacking at his paper and declared him “not a fit person” to run an international company — a damning conclusion that nonetheless seems to have had little immediate effect.

  • deconstructiva

    Catherine, thanks for this post + highly detailed info., including the cathedral’s failure to let everyone see the main event (architecture is my career), a huge no-no in any assembly hall layout. Also thanks for pointing out that “peculiar” also means “unique to” and not just “curious / unusual.” If the other Catherine doesn’t pledge to obey her husband, does the Prince get a free pass too? Thus, who does the laundry / mow the lawn?
    .
    Of course, anyone should be free to invite someone to a wedding. However, are there often standard or unique (not curious) political or personal protocols to invite specific heads of state to a royal nuptials? Or does the couple suffer the same family infighting “internal pressures” as everyone else? re: Bahrain, do the couple know the King personally and thus he gets an invite? Thanks for your thoughts.

  • Catherine Mayer

    The wedding is not a state occasion because William isn’t the heir to the throne. That’s why the Obama’s aren’t invited, for example. So the guestlist is, theoretically, the lovebirds’ own choice. But there are protocols and traditions that mean they still invite other royals as well as their friends, family, top pols etc. And there’s also the question of what message they wish to send out with their invitations and the whole event. I suspect this is closer to the image they’re aiming to project: http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2011/mar/16/royal-wedding-donations-charity-presents

    Not sure at what stage the architectural barriers were erected inside Westminster Abbey but I suspect the division of the posh and the less posh to be very much intentional. Have you ever used your skills as an architect to help maintain the status quo? Or as your online name suggests, are you more inclined to tear down walls?

  • deconstructiva

    Both, sort of: you figured out the name though right now, alas, am not working full time due to horrible economy (will freelance later as things improve). Not many walls moving here at all. Most of career was spent in retail so in a sense I was both maintaining status quo – of helping retail clients make lots of money – and trying to open up stores and malls to as many folks as possible. Not much anarchy there, sigh, but I’ll try to tear down class walls when I can get away with it.
    .
    I think you’re 100% on target about separating peasants from preachers in church. I have some church design experience but know many with more. There’s a lot of hierarchy in the typ. church fold, not my thing. I prefer retail’s open “honest” greed: much management but even more outreach to customers, either to a niche group like sunglasses or a mass market like a department store. But I’d love to expand into certain public / charity works like animal shelters, etc. Many here are struggling with finances but when they can rebuild / expand I’ll go for it. That’s a good class barrier shattering experience.
    .
    I still follow designers like Lord Foster, Lord Rogers, Hadid, Grimshaw, Libeskin, Eisenman and Morphosis office big time …with nowhere the success, alas. Most shopping malls / lifestyle centers here are clearly NOT cutting edge but once back to work I’ll work on that. Interesting to note that much forward-thinking building had rich sponsors (individual and corporate) thru history: even Mackintosh knew that. Ditto for Foster: IBM in 1971, then Willis Faber, then patroned Sainsbury Centre (yes!), etc. Now that’s worth aiming for. I’ll keep trying. Keep up your excellent work, Catherine.

blog comments powered by Disqus