Why the BRICS Summit Won’t Accomplish Anything

Yep, just what the world needs—another international summit. On Thursday, leaders of Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa convened under the palm trees of China’s Hainan Island for the third BRICS summit. The acronym was coined back in 2001 by an economist at Goldman Sachs to describe the bright emerging economies of Brazil, Russia, India and China. (The “S” for South Africa was formally added to the bloc this year—and it does raise the question of whether, say, Kenya or Kazakhstan has a better chance of joining next to round out the BRICKS acronym.)

Maybe BRIC sounded catchy in an investment-bank report. In real life, not so much. Even as its organizers try to hype the random assortment of nations as a new G5—its members constitute around 40% of the world’s population and 20% of global GDP—there’s little evidence this grouping can unify itself to counter a presumed Western-dominated tilt in global economics and politics.

That’s because the five nations’ individual aspirations are so diverse as to make shared ambitions difficult to articulate. What really ties Russia and India? Or South Africa and Brazil? Yes, they all are hungry for natural resources to power their economies. But that hardly makes them unique among growing nations. Four of the five BRICS are eager to improve trade relations with the fifth member: China. But, again, pretty much every country on the planet wants both a bigger piece of the China pie and a correction of trade imbalances with the People’s Republic. And the same four out of five BRICS are hardly happy with China’s currency situation. Yet a meeting in Hainan isn’t likely to shape the policy of China’s finance czars, some of whom have openly angled for the Yuan to eventually replace the U.S. Dollar as the global currency of choice.

The prelude to the BRICS summit did involve the usual unveiling of trade deals between various members of the economic bloc. And the BRICS are expected to push for increased elite access to the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund. They may even say something about Libya. But it’s almost a given that what they say won’t be very interesting. That’s the nature of these kinds of international summits: lots of talk behind closed doors, little of substance said publically.

But even if the BRICS confab wraps up quietly, there’s good news for summit enthusiasts. On Thursday through Saturday, on the same tropical Chinese island, another meeting of international minds will occur: the Boao Forum for Asia. Packaged as a sort of sun-and-surf version of Davos, Boao, which is named after the Hainan town that hosts the conference, has been convening since 2001 without producing much of anything. According to its founding mission, Boao “is committed to promoting regional economic integration and bringing Asian countries even closer to their development goals.” The publicity material for the Forum goes on to say that “countries across the region have responded with strong support and great enthusiasm, and the world has listened attentively to the voice coming from a tiny, quiet and scenic island at the southernmost part of China.” This year, Chinese President Hu Jintao will give Boao’s keynote address. Any guesses on whether the world will truly “listen attentively?”

Related Topics: Boao, brazil, brics, China, Economy, global economy, Hainan, Hu Jintao, IMF, indonesia, Russia, South Africa, summits, Africa, Asia, Business, China, Democracy, Dictatorships, Foreign Investment, Geo-political tensions, India, Libya
  • Latest on Global Spin

    Oded Balilty / Reuters

    Netanyahu’s New Government: Warming to Peace Talks with the Palestinians?

    A flurry of gestures toward the Palestinian leadership suggests that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, in his new role as leader of a center-right government, is warming toward the resumption of peace talks — or at least giving the appearance of warming; call it a rosy glow rising from a pair of announcements on Monday. One was about Palestinian prisoners who had been carrying out a mass hunger strike for weeks inside Israeli prisons. With several prisoners near death, Netanyahu approved an agreement that improves prison conditions and permits visits by family members in the Gaza Strip, the heavily guarded enclave that Palestinians have been allowed out of only for medical emergencies. Greeted by Palestinians as a victory, the deal eased concerns that a prisoner’s death might combust what are usually routine protests planned for Tuesday’s commemoration of Nakba Day, the “catastrophe” of Israel’s 1948 victory over Arab forces trying to prevent the establishment of a Jewish state.

    Bernat Armangue / AP

    Palestinians Mark Their Day of “Catastrophe”

    Protesters challenge Israeli troops in the West Bank while commemorating the Nakba, or “day of catastrophe” in Arabic, which marks the day when Israel declared its statehood in 1948—an act which forced thousands of Palestinians out of their homes and into a life of exile

    Christopher Furlong/ Getty Images

    Rebekah Brooks, Husband Charged in Phone-Hacking Scandal

    The convoluted saga of the British phone-hacking scandal seems to have been dragging on longer than a back-to-back performance of Wagner’s Ring Cycle. Yet despite the demise of Rupert Murdoch‘s News of the World, the launching of a public inquiry into British press standards, three police investigations and more than 40 arrests, the scandal has yet to draw real blood. The closest it has come was a report released this month by a Parliamentary committee, which accused Murdoch of turning a blind eye to the hacking at his paper and declared him “not a fit person” to run an international company — a damning conclusion that nonetheless seems to have had little immediate effect.

  • Cássio Borges

    Great text. I am sure you will finish high school with very good grades.

  • 94134gamesmith

    Gamesmith94134: Do the BRICS believe in free markets?

    Mr. Shuman,
    “The regulation of the derivatives market for commodities should be accordingly strengthened to prevent activities capable of destabilizing markets.” It can be corrected if we all being honest how derivatives market for commodities is operated; not manipulated. I am not questioning on the misquoted derivatives on real estate or banking that went under; it was the imbalance of trade that tilted the market and left everyone puzzled how our global monetary system applies.
    If you defrauded, not punished; but appreciated. So, is it the force the G-7 applies to stabilize the market that the more sovereignty debts the more value does to its currencies by its throw weight? Euro pluses PIIGS add 15% (1.4 rose from 1.2 to a Dollar), or Yen added Fukushima deserve 10% (90 down to 83), but a trillion more deficits for US that cut its value by 15%. I suppose it is the way how G-7 wants everyone else to pay for their debts and maintain the stability of the global market and enslave the non-monetarily sovereignty nations or emerging nations for sake of consumerism or balance of payments. Who is their accountant and I need him to fix my loan too? Is it IMF or the SDR? Is it the resolution to the debt crisis? If it is no monopoly, shall I say socialism or oligopolies? Why can’t the G-7 put on other shoes of the emerging market nations or the non-monetarily sovereignties like inflation by 5%? FED said inflation did not affect our economy even though we paid 11% of our living expense on gas; temporally under our sub zero interest policy. It was because their currencies like Chinese yuan (renmimbi) are undervalued and still pay over $4 for it.
    Mr. Schuman stated, “All of the BRICS have been huge beneficiaries of free capital flows, which have boosted their wealth and created jobs for their large populations. So the BRICS want to enjoy the benefits of free markets while jettisoning what they don’t care for. We all do, of course, but in the West, and especially the United States, there is much more wariness about the potential negative consequences of market interference than we find among the BRICS.”
    Well said; But why I am puzzled why we give up our houses in foreclosures. It went up 12% last month and we gave our money to invest the emerging market nations instead of saving us from further embarrassment. Those hedge fund managers should buy us out with full price. Why China or Brazil? Did they learn the lesson of us that their assistance is not needed if any of their citizens would take 70 years of earnings to buy one house just because of the free capital flows?
    I am glad the BRICS are united to capture the moment under the decree of slavery of the G-7; and challenged the IMF in the SDR to adopt Chinese yuan (renmimbi) as part of the exchange. I think it is the best act of diversification to our heated and imbalanced global economy; and everyone is playing fair in the free trade market. In addition, the ruling on the policy that defaulted on loan must pay, and deficit from trade cannot make its currencies stronger should be affirmed; so, everyone should earn its privilege to lead and not master its disguise to cheat or enslave.
    By putting on some ones’ shoes, he should understand better of the free capital flows and inflation that investments work ambidextrously in growth and exploitation
    May the Buddha bless you?

blog comments powered by Disqus