Another Tibetan Monk Sets Himself Ablaze—and the Karmapa’s Take on the Fiery Protests

Exile Tibetan monks hold a candle light vigil in Dharmsala, India, as they react to news reports of self-immolation by two Tibetan monks at the Kirti Monastery in Sichuan province's Aba prefectuture, China, Sept. 26, 2011. (Photo: Ashwini Bhatia / AP)

Kham is on fire. This year, five Tibetan monks have set themselves ablaze in the ethnically Tibetan-dominated region of China’s Sichuan province that is part of an area called Kham in Tibetan. The most recent self-immolation was on Oct. 3 in a market in the town of Aba (in Mandarin) or Ngaba (in Tibetan), according to exile Tibetan groups. While he burned, the teenaged monk named Kelsang Wangchuck reportedly held aloft a picture of the Dalai Lama, Tibet’s exiled spiritual leader who is as reviled by Beijing as he is revered by Tibetans. Like the other monks who set themselves on fire, Kalsang was apparently calling for religious and cultural freedoms that are lacking across the Chinese-controlled Tibetan high plateau. His condition, after local authorities put out the flames, is not known; at least two of the other Tibetan monks died from their fiery protests earlier this year.

While in the Tibetan exile headquarters of Dharamsala, India recently, I raised the issue of the self-immolating clerics with the Karmapa, the third-most senior monk in the Tibetan Buddhist cosmology. He looked a bit uncomfortable and, as the Indian security agents and Tibetan minders around him leaned in to hear his answer, he switched from Tibetan to Mandarin—a language the entourage around him did not understand. The 26-year-old’s answer surprised me. “Monks take a vow that says they are not allowed to end their lives,” he said in his calm, soft-spoken voice. “But on the other hand, these actions are not for an individual, they are for a people.”

In 1992, a seven-year-old boy named Ogyen Trinley Dorje who lived in a yak-hair tent in eastern Tibet was chosen as the 17th incarnation of the Karmapa. The choice was a rare agreement between Chinese-sanctioned monks and the Dalai Lama, who had fled to India in 1959 as Chinese repression in Tibet intensified. (However, there was not full accord within the Tibetan community, because a separate faction instead picked another boy, Trinley Thaye Dorje, whose acolytes shrewdly registered the www.karmapa.org domain name.) After his selection, the Karmapa disappeared into a Tibetan monastery, where he was taught the glories of the socialism alongside Buddhist theology. Tibetans feared he was lost. Then the 14-year-old Karmapa, like the Dalai Lama before him, escaped Tibet over the Himalayas. Since 2000, he has lived in the Indian hill-station of Dharamsala.

The spectacular escape, along with large reserves of Chinese yuan found in the Karmapa’s offices earlier this year, led some Indians to wonder whether the young cleric was, in fact, a Chinese spy. But the Indian central government has since cleared him of any transgressions related to the Chinese money cache, which local Indian authorities initially had hinted were questionably sourced.

In fact, as Tibetans begin to contemplate a future without the 76-year-old Dalai Lama, who has single-handedly raised the profile of Tibet’s struggle abroad, some are pinning their hopes on the Karmapa. In terms of Buddhist hierarchy, the Karmapa can never be venerated as the Dalai Lama (or his reincarnation, if there is to be one) is. Nevertheless, Tibetans are guided as much by faith as by a sense of nationhood. After the current Dalai Lama dies, the Karmapa could serve as a key unifying force—even more than an exile Tibetan politician.

When we talked, the Karmapa was careful to underline that his role isn’t a political one. Nevertheless, his message carried little optimism and much urgency for his homeland. “It’s a crucial time for Tibet now,” he said. “We cannot afford to carry out our fight generation after generation. If our culture is gone, if our religion is gone, even if we do get independence, what’s the point?” Certainly, the Kham monks who have torched themselves are expressing an urgent desperation. In 2008, protests and riots flared across the Tibetan plateau, and Beijing responded with an iron fist. But as the eruption of monastic dissent proves, the ensuing security crackdown has failed to suppress Tibetan anger. Kham may well burn on.

Related Topics: Aba, dalai lama, Dharamsala, karmapa, kham, Ngaba, Self-Immolation, tibet, Tibetan Monks, Asia, Borders, China, Democracy, Dictatorships, Geo-political tensions, Human rights, India, Minorities
  • Latest on Global Spin

    Benjamin Hiller/Corbis

    Must-Reads from Around the World, May 22, 2012

    Summit Struggle - Ahead of Wednesday’s crunch E.U. summit, Der Spiegel reports that new French President François Hollande will pressure German Chancellor Angela Merkel to agree to euro bonds, which she has so far strictly opposed. “Italy and Britain are expected to back Hollande in a further sign that Merkel is increasingly isolated in Europe with her austerity plan for saving the euro,” the German news magazine predicts.

    Yin Dongxun/Xinhua/ZUMAPRESS.com

    Jerusalem Day in the Old City: The Conflict Marches On

    Sunday was Jerusalem Day in Israel, a holiday once again observed by thousands of young Jews who chanted as they marched through Arab neighborhoods conquered in the 1967 Six Day War. The tension is always highest in the narrow passages of the largely Palestinian Old City. So much so that the city’s police this year tried to route the column of youths — most singing patriotic and religious songs, a few chanting “Death to the Arabs” — away from the Arab Quarter. But in the end, the police proved powerless against tradition, and the original route was restored. On Jerusalem Day, marching through the Arab Quarter is the whole point.

    Pablo Martinez Monsivais / AP

    Obama’s Afghanistan Problem: Neither Karzai Nor the Taliban Like the ‘Reconciliation’ Script

    President Barack Obama huddled with President Hamid Karzai in Chicago on Sunday, urging Afghanistan’s leader to accelerate negotiations with the Taliban over a political solution to the longest war in America’s history. But the prospect for Karzai negotiating successfully with the insurgents is clouded by a question raised by Josef Stalin, on the eve of World War II, in response to the suggestion that he offer concessions to the Pope: “How many divisions does he have?” The Taliban now ask the same question about Karzai. And should the Afghan leader also ask himself the question, he might reach a similarly dispiriting conclusion. Karzai’s independent power base is minimal, as is his ability to influence the outcome of his country’s civil war absent direct U.S. involvement. And that gives neither Karzai nor the Taliban much incentive to cut a deal with the other.

blog comments powered by Disqus