Despite their much-anticipated announcement early Friday of a crucial pact to confront Europe’s surging debt crisis, the leaders who agreed to the deal might want to consider re-naming their mutual club the European Disunion all the same. Because while the main focus of the accord was supposed to be the sweeping debt-reduction rules to which signatories will bind themselves, most of the attention was instead directed to the four countries — led by Britain — that refused or hesitated to join their 23 European partners in the new effort to quell the region’s financial and economic turmoil. And in agreeing to disagree on the new treaty, leaders made it clear that the European Union is far from unified, even in crisis.
-
-
Full ListMost Popular
- What Lies? Beneath the Mysterious History of an Iranian Nuclear Site
- A Royal Party: The Commonwealth Celebrates 60 Years of Queen Elizabeth II
- Cover Story: Why Bibi Netanyahu Is King of Israel
- Obama’s Afghanistan Problem: Neither Karzai Nor the Taliban Like the ‘Reconciliation’ Script
- From China’s State Press, a Not-So-Fond Farewell to Activist Chen Guangcheng
- Chen Guangcheng’s New York City Home: A Soviet-Style Complex in Greenwich Village
- Must-Reads from Around the World, May 22, 2012
- Earthquake in Northeast Italy Kills 4, Cracks Bell Towers
- Where the Wildlings Are: In Game of Thrones, the Anarchists Have More Fun
- Why Did Michele Bachmann Flip-Flop on Being a Swiss Citizen?
- 5 Things Remarkable Bosses Never Do
- China Photoshop Fail: 'Floating' Park Inspectors Prompt Online Ridicule
- How Cash Keeps Poor People Poor
- MIT Scientists Figure Out How to Get Ketchup Out of the Bottle
- Feeding the Planet Without Destroying It
- Windows Aero: Why I'm Glad It's Dead
- A Visit with Turkey's Controversial Religious Movement
- Euro Crisis: Why A Greek Exit Could Be Much Worse Than Expected
- Researchers Probe the Potential Health Benefits of Palm Oil
- Does Organic Food Turn You into a Jerk?
-
-
VideosMore Videos
-







